With shareholder activism relatively subdued in the U.K., Europe’s traditional hotbed, Germany is seeing an upturn in activist demands.

Five Germany-based companies were targeted by primary- and partial-focus activists in 2023, up from four in 2022 and three in 2021, with last year’s advances accounting for 14% of all European campaigns in the period, the highest level of activity in the region since 2020, according to Diligent Market Intelligence’s (DMI) 

 module.

Meanwhile, activism in the U.K. has held relatively flat in recent years with 12 companies targeted by primary- and partial-focus activists in 2023, down from 13 in 2022 and the lowest number recorded since 2019. In all, U.K. issuers accounted for 32% of all companies targeted in the region last year, versus 36% in 2022 and 41% in 2021.

“If you go back four or five years, Germany was vying with France as the number two target market for activists in Europe,” Paul Kinrade, managing director at Alvarez & Marsal’s activism practice, told DMI. “Now Germany is clearly the second market after the U.K., which has been holding steady.”

French companies accounted for 8% of activity in the wider European region in 2023, in line with 2022 and well below the 14% recorded in 2019. In the first quarter of this year, just one French company has attracted activist attention while three German companies have been targeted.





Germany offers plenty of opportunities for activist investors. The market is relatively undervalued, with German companies trading at an average price-to-earnings ratio of 12.83, cheaper than any major European market except Italy, and a fraction of the 24.5 multiple on U.S. stocks.

The market has plenty of industrial and healthcare conglomerates which, Kinrade noted, are attractive to activists because of the wealth of opportunities they offer when it comes to enhancing performance, especially while waiting for the M&A market to open up again.

“At industrial businesses you've got the real estate footprint, you've got employees, you've got margins, you've got insource and outsource, supply chains. There are many different levers [activists] can focus on to drive shareholder performance,” Kinrade said.

In one of Europe's most contentious proxy fights, German chemicals company Brenntag faced demands from U.S. activists Engine Capital and PrimeStone Capital to separate out its specialties division. Despite gaining support from proxy advisors Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, a possible first in German corporate history, the activists failed to win two contested board seats at Brenntag’s June 15 annual meeting.

More recently, German pharma and crop sciences group Bayer nominated Jeffrey Ubben, founder of Inclusive Capital Partners, as a non-executive director as it faces multiple calls from activist Bluebell Capital to separate its crop science from its pharma business due to a lack of synergies.

German law also grants significant rights to individual shareholders, including the right to file countermotions in person at a general meeting and file proposals regarding the election of supervisory board members or auditors. Such on-the-day proposals can typically only be voted on by shareholders attending the meeting, potentially enabling an activist to pass measures with a smaller, more supportive pool of voters.

One of the clearest examples of this tactic came in 2019, when London-based hedge fund Pelham Capital won a seat on the supervisory board of Scout24 by filing a counterproposal at the company's annual meeting.





Securing a seat on the supervisory board, however, is only the first step in any activist campaign in Germany, due to its unique two-tier board structure.

Unlike the one-tier board structure commonly implemented in the U.S., U.K. and most other markets, Germany, as well at the Netherlands, has a two-tier board structure consisting of a management board (responsible for decisions related to day-to-day operations), and a supervisory board, (responsible for overseeing the management board, but typically uninvolved in operational decisions).

Shareholders of German companies can only elect supervisory board members, not management board members, and as a result cannot launch proxy fights aimed directly at the CEO or other executives, a common activist tactic in other markets.

“CEOs and chief financial officers (CFOs) in the U.K. and U.S. are up for reelection on a regular basis, but in Germany you can’t touch them,” noted Angelika Horstmeier, managing director at Alliance Advisors, who is responsible for the German market.

“Activism has to work in a funny way in Germany,” she explained, with activists first seeking a seat on the supervisory board and, if successful, using that position to influence management changes. “It's a long-winded way that's quite complicated, so Germany is not an easy country in which to do activism.”

Proxy advisors have noted that there is a long-standing and controversial practice in Germany for top executives to join a company’s supervisory board at the end of their operational careers, which can raise concerns regarding their independence. Earlier this year, proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services recommended investors replace the supervisory board chairs of BASF and Munich Re, both of whom previously served as CEOs of their groups.

Last October, U.S. activist fund Cannell Capital initiated a campaign to replace the supervisory board of VIA Optronics, accusing its members of ignoring potential wrongdoing by its founder Jürgen Eichner and overseeing a 94% stock price to plunge in a little under three years. In April, CFO Markus Peters and Vice-Chair Arthur Tan announced their resignations, while shortly after the company revealed it would be delisting its shares from the U.S. market.





One of the most significant changes in Germany has been the increasing role of domestic investors, with local shareholders Union Investment and Deka Investment among those to launch campaigns last year.

Company founders and other insiders have also become more willing to use activism to enhance shareholder value.

On April 24, flatexDEGIRO Group CEO Frank Niehage stepped down due to “differing views on the strategic development and for the benefit of the company,” weeks after the digital finance company's co-founder and top shareholder Bernd Förtsch told the media that the company needed “new blood.”

Upon his departure, Niehage claimed he had resigned to "avoid further damage" to the company's reputation and accused Förtsch of trying to get a seat on the supervisory board "through the back door.”

IN-DEPTH: Germany’s activism resurgence

 in Central California recently moved from bimonthly meetings to monthly meetings with the help of their board management software. Their meetings became more streamlined and efficient as the paper agenda was replaced with electronic documents they could easily review and annotate. Easy access to documents saved time before, during and after meetings.

Board members’ quick adoption and use of the software also improved the public perception of the board as forward-thinking and innovative leaders. Visalia community members also appreciated the transparency made possible by the software.

Not all board members and trustees of public boards adopt new software so easily, which can make it difficult to reap the benefits of the software investment for board members, administrators and the public. Whether due to unfamiliarity with the platform or resistance to change, encouraging board members to engage with the software is crucial for maximizing its benefits.

Encouraging the use of the software starts with understanding the reasons why some board members may find it difficult. Some reasons include:

Board management software comes with various features and functionalities. If board members are not adequately trained on how to use these features, they may feel overwhelmed or unsure of how to navigate the platform. Without guidance, they may revert to familiar, and possibly less efficient, methods of communication and collaboration. Lack of familiarity and lack of training can make board members frustrated or disengaged.

One of the primary reasons board members may not want to use board management software is resistance to change or a preference for the status quo. This resistance can stem from fear of the unknown, concerns about their ability to use the technology, or a reluctance to disrupt established routines. Some board members, particularly those from older generations, may face challenges learning to use new technology.

Lack of clear communication and expectations:

 Inadequate communication and unclear expectations regarding the use of the software impair adoption. If members don’t know how it fits into their roles and responsibilities, they may see it as a burden rather than a valuable tool. Without a shared understanding of the software’s purpose and benefits, board members may fail to fully appreciate its potential to streamline governance processes and improve decision-making. This can lead to disengagement or even resistance.

 Public board members are often volunteers who perform board service on top of their regular jobs and careers. They may sit on other boards and have commitments and responsibilities along with demanding schedules on top of their work for your board. If using the board management software is perceived as time-consuming or adds an extra layer of complexity, members may opt for traditional methods such as using email.

Cybersecurity is a top issue for board members who want to make sure sensitive documents and personal information are safeguarded. Without reassurances or an understanding of how board management software can project against cyber hacking, board members could be reluctant to use the software.

The Visalia Unified School District and other public governance boards invest in board management software like Diligent Community for a variety of reasons. Making sure that board members understand and see the need for the 

 is a big first step to getting their buy-in to use it regularly in their board work.

Transitioning from a paper agenda to a digital agenda does more than save trees (although it does do that) — it also saves administrative time and money. Diligent Community allows for secure agenda packet delivery to board members, and edits and changes to the agenda can be made quickly and distributed to board members as well as to the community.

The public can view the agenda and follow online during the meeting through livestreaming on the public website. This transparency helps build public trust in the governing board. Diligent Community offers the ability for the board to vote digitally and have those votes stored and accessible. This also adds to the board’s 

central library and document storage area

. Board members no longer need to search through paper agendas, emails, texts, websites and shared drives to find out the information they need. Searchable policy manuals, meeting minutes, strategic plans and other data can ease governance frustration. The platform becomes the 

 for board members, administrators and the public.

Now that you understand why some board members may be slow to adopt the software, you can work with them to remove barriers to using and thriving on the platform.

Here are some tips for administrators to encourage board members to get the full benefits of board management software:

 Invest time and resources into providing thorough training sessions for board members. Offer both initial training sessions to familiarize them with the software's features and ongoing support to address any questions or issues that may arise. By ensuring that board members feel confident using the platform, you can increase their willingness to engage with it. Diligent Community offers initial and ongoing training.

 As I mentioned earlier, it’s essential to clearly communicate the benefits of using board management software. Emphasize how the software streamlines meeting preparation, facilitates collaboration, improves accountability and transparency, and saves time and resources. Emphasize the security features of the software and how information is protected from cyber criminals. Demonstrating the tangible advantages of the software can motivate board members to actively participate.

 Recognize that not all board members may have the same technological proficiency or preferences. By offering customized training, you can build their trust and comfort with the platform.

 Encourage board members to share their experiences and feedback. Address issues quickly and effectively. Incorporating board member input when adjusting or changing procedures will generate goodwill and increase buy-in.

 Success breeds success. As more board members engage with the software, the board will reach a tipping point of usage. The more they see the software making their work, and the work of the administrators easier, the faster they will adopt.

 It’s important that board members have access to plenty of resources, support and training including user guides, FAQs, tutorials, and technical support resources when live tech support isn’t readily available. Your board management software partner should be able to provide all of these. Remember to celebrate early successes and point out growth in skills, which will increase the confidence of those who are having difficulties.

Digital transformation, when your board has fully integrated technology like management software to streamline operations, manage online risks, and engage the public, is easier said than done. When you look at the benefits of this transformation, the board can see that it’s a worthy goal to work toward to improve governance and leadership for your organization and community.

When figuring out how to get all board members up to speed and comfortable with new technology, you can see it as momentum toward digital transformation. Use this 

 to see how your board can grow in digital maturity.

 is designed to meet the needs of public governance boards. It offers initial and ongoing training and technical support for board members to ensure they can govern with the best tools available.

Contact Customer Success to ask about board member training and support for your publicly elected board.

Diligent

Blog

IN-DEPTH: Germany’s activism resurgence

Proven ways to encourage trustees to use your board management software

Solutions

Resources

Company

Your Data Matters

Diligent

Blog

IN-DEPTH: Germany’s activism resurgence

Proven ways to encourage trustees to use your board management software

SolutionsSolutions

ResourcesResources

CompanyCompany

Your Data Matters

Solutions

Resources

Company